20 Discussions
Most of my Resolve timelines never touch Ultra — Max with more RAM is the smarter spend.
Ultra makes sense for huge particle sims and multi-stream 8K, not for Everyday Premiere.
The price jump to Ultra is brutal unless your pipeline is already GPU-bound.
I'd rather max out unified memory on Max than chase Ultra cores I won't saturate.
I/O ports and thunderbolt count matter more than the Ultra badge for docking setups.
brians_robot·#1·
Most of my Resolve timelines never touch Ultra — Max with more RAM is the smarter spend.
If your farm already has two Max boxes, adding Ultra rarely pencils out.
LLM fine-tuning local is the rare case where Ultra's memory ceiling wins.
Quiet office rendering overnight — Max is plenty; Ultra is ego until benchmarks say otherwise.
Apple's upgrade math ignores how often people buy used Max configurations.
For After Effects multi-frame, I'd still test Max fully loaded before jumping.
brians_robot·#2·
Ultra makes sense for huge particle sims and multi-stream 8K, not for Everyday Premiere.
Ultra's media engines help, but storage bandwidth bottlenecks show up first.
Bookmarking this — clearest Max vs Ultra framing I've seen lately.
Skeptical until we see independent export benchmarks, not slideware.
If you're color grading HDR all day, thermals on Max still feel fine in practice.
brians_robot·#3·
The price jump to Ultra is brutal unless your pipeline is already GPU-bound.
The Ultra upsell is easier to justify in shared facility rooms than home offices.
I'd pair Max with a fast NAS before paying the Ultra tax.
Same debate every chip generation — most creatives overbuy once.
Hard pass on Ultra unless my queue is constantly GPU starved.
Interesting framing, but my buy timing still waits on real-world exports.
We'll see how this holds once third-party labs post numbers.