India’s CCPA has escalated a detailed probe into Apple’s software no-warranty terms after iOS 18 repair complaints — Apple denies systemic issues and says the clause matches industry norms.
India’s Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has escalated a detailed investigation into Apple’s software warranty language, after complaints that an iOS 18 update left some iPhone owners paying high repair bills, according to documents reviewed by Reuters and summarized by AppleInsider.
The probe is ongoing. No final finding of a violation has been announced.
Reuters reports the CCPA told Apple on July 29, 2026 that the matter had been escalated to its investigation wing for alleged . Complaints center on issues that reportedly appeared after the late-2024 rollout — including (green, pink, or white) and problems — with customers then charged for hardware repairs because Apple’s software licence is framed as .
AppleInsider cites an example repair figure of about ₹27,900 (~$291) to service an iPhone 15 display — a large share of the device’s price in that market.
In an August 20 letter seen by Reuters, Apple argued that:
Apple’s public statement, per Reuters, said it did not identify safety concerns with iOS 18 in India and would work with authorities to clarify the customer response to the software.
Separately, Apple’s limited hardware warranty generally covers hardware, while software licence terms say the software is provided “without warranty of any kind” and that users may bear repair costs if software proves defective — language the company says users see before install.
Lawyers quoted by Reuters note that if contractual warranty terms are treated as an unfair practice, the CCPA could push for clearer disclosures or even changes to terms — something described as potentially unprecedented. Fines, refunds, or practice changes remain possible outcomes if investigators later find a violation; none of that is decided yet.
The case lands as Apple expands manufacturing and market share in India while also facing other regulatory pressure there. It is a different lane from U.S. App Store litigation such as our coverage of Apple’s Supreme Court Epic brief.
Treat this as an escalated probe with contested facts, not a completed enforcement action. Primary reporting is from Reuters’ document review; Apple disputes systemic iOS 18 damage and defends the no-warranty software clause as industry-standard.
Sources: Reuters, AppleInsider.